A money judgment entered by a court outside the United States has no automatic force in New York. Before a creditor can restrain a bank account, place a lien on real estate, or send a sheriff to levy on assets located here, the foreign country judgment must first be recognized by a New York court. Only after recognition does the judgment become enforceable through the same powerful collection remedies available to holders of New York judgments.
New York is one of the most important venues in the world for this process. Enormous volumes of capital flow through New York banks, and debtors who successfully hide assets abroad frequently hold accounts, securities, receivables, or real property within reach of the New York courts. Our firm represents foreign and domestic creditors in every stage of this process — from the recognition proceeding itself through aggressive post-recognition judgment enforcement.
Recognition of foreign country money judgments in New York is governed by CPLR Article 53, New York's enactment of the Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act. The Legislature substantially revised and modernized Article 53 in 2021, adopting the 2005 version of the uniform act. The key provisions are:
Understanding how these sections interact is the difference between a fast, efficient recognition proceeding and a case that stalls for years on avoidable procedural objections.
Under CPLR 5302(a), Article 53 applies to a foreign country judgment that:
Importantly, a judgment can be "final and conclusive" even if an appeal is pending abroad. Under CPLR 5307, the New York court has discretion to stay the recognition proceeding until the foreign appeal concludes, but the pendency of an appeal does not by itself defeat recognition.
CPLR 5302(b) excludes three categories from the article, even when they award money:
Under CPLR 5302(c), the party seeking recognition bears the burden of establishing that the judgment falls within the article. In practice, this means the creditor's moving papers should include a certified or exemplified copy of the foreign judgment, a certified English translation, and proof — usually an affidavit from foreign counsel — that the judgment is final, conclusive, and enforceable where rendered. Assembling this evidentiary package correctly at the outset prevents the most common early-stage objections.
Unlike the streamlined clerk-filing process available for domesticating a foreign judgment in New York, a foreign country judgment cannot simply be filed with the county clerk. CPLR 5303 requires a judicial proceeding. Recognition may be raised:
Because a foreign country money judgment qualifies as "a judgment" under CPLR 3213, the creditor can commence the action by serving a summons with a motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint rather than a conventional complaint. This is almost always the preferred route: it skips the pleading stage and puts the merits before a judge immediately.
The mechanics matter. The motion's return date must give the debtor at least the time to appear provided by CPLR 320(a) — generally 20 days if the summons is delivered personally within New York, or 30 days if service is completed by other means or outside the state. If the debtor raises no triable issue under the limited defenses available in CPLR 5304, the court grants summary judgment and directs entry of a New York judgment.
Suppose a foreign commercial court entered a final judgment for the equivalent of $2 million on March 1, 2023, against a debtor who maintains a brokerage account in New York. Working with our firm, the creditor:
The moment the New York judgment is entered, the full arsenal of CPLR Article 52 enforcement devices becomes available.
The 2021 amendments added a clear limitations rule. Under CPLR 5303(d), an action for recognition must be commenced within the earlier of:
Two examples show how this works:
Because the deadline depends on foreign law, creditors should not assume they have 15 years. Some legal systems extinguish judgments in six years or less. We evaluate the foreign limitations period with local counsel at the outset of every engagement so the New York filing is never at risk.
The debtor cannot relitigate the merits of the underlying dispute. The New York court does not ask whether the foreign court got the case right — it asks only whether one of the statutory grounds for non-recognition exists. Under CPLR 5304(c), the debtor bears the burden of establishing any such ground.
| Mandatory Grounds — CPLR 5304(a) (court must deny recognition) | Discretionary Grounds — CPLR 5304(b) (court may deny recognition) |
|---|---|
| The judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with due process | The debtor did not receive notice in time to defend |
| The foreign court lacked personal jurisdiction over the debtor | The judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing party of an opportunity to present its case |
| The foreign court lacked subject matter jurisdiction | The judgment or the underlying claim is repugnant to the public policy of New York or of the United States |
| The judgment conflicts with another final judgment | |
| The proceeding violated an agreement to resolve the dispute elsewhere (e.g., an arbitration or forum-selection clause) | |
| Jurisdiction was based only on personal service and the foreign forum was seriously inconvenient | |
| Circumstances raise substantial doubt about the integrity of the rendering court with respect to the judgment | |
| The specific proceeding was not compatible with due process |
These defenses are narrow by design. New York courts have repeatedly emphasized that Article 53 was enacted to promote the efficient enforcement of foreign judgments and to assure foreign creditors that their judgments will be honored here. Generalized complaints about the foreign legal system or dissatisfaction with the outcome do not qualify.
Because lack of personal jurisdiction is a mandatory ground for non-recognition, CPLR 5305 lists bases of jurisdiction New York will accept as sufficient, including: personal service in the foreign country; voluntary appearance (other than to contest jurisdiction or protect seized property); prior agreement to submit to that court's jurisdiction; the debtor's domicile or principal place of business there; a business office there where the claim arose from that office's activity; and operation of a motor vehicle or airplane there where the claim arose from that operation. The statute also permits courts to accept other bases of jurisdiction. If your foreign judgment fits one of these categories, the most potent mandatory defense is off the table.
Under CPLR 5306, a recognized foreign country judgment is enforceable in the same manner and to the same extent as a New York judgment. That unlocks Article 52 of the CPLR, the enforcement toolkit we deploy in every judgment collection matter:
A New York money judgment is enforceable for twenty years under CPLR 211(b), which frequently gives creditors far more time to collect than the judgment enjoyed in its country of origin.
Foreign judgments are usually denominated in foreign currency. Under Judiciary Law § 27(b), a New York judgment based on an obligation denominated in a foreign currency is entered in that currency and converted to U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing on the date of entry of the New York judgment. Timing therefore has real economic consequences: a strengthening or weakening dollar between recognition and entry can move the recovery by a meaningful percentage. Once the New York judgment is entered, post-judgment interest accrues at New York's statutory rate of 9% per year under CPLR 5004 — often far more favorable than the rate available in the country of origin.
Recognition proceedings sit at the intersection of New York procedure, foreign law, and international asset tracing. Errors — an uncertified translation, an insufficient finality affidavit, a miscalculated CPLR 3213 return date, or a missed CPLR 5303(d) deadline — can cost months or forfeit the claim entirely. Our attorneys handle these proceedings regularly, coordinate with foreign counsel to prove up the judgment, and transition seamlessly from recognition to enforcement so that the debtor never gets breathing room to dissipate assets.
We evaluate your foreign country judgment for recognition under CPLR Article 53, confirm the limitations deadline, and file the recognition action — typically by CPLR 3213 motion — while simultaneously investigating the debtor's New York assets. Once the judgment is recognized, we immediately deploy restraining notices, executions, and turnover proceedings to convert your foreign judgment into actual recovery. Contact us for a case-specific assessment of your judgment and the debtor's reachable assets.
You can contact us by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].