Winning a money judgment in a New York court is often only half the battle. Many judgment creditors quickly discover that a judgment debtor is unwilling to pay voluntarily, has structured assets to frustrate collection, or holds property that cannot easily be reached through routine enforcement devices such as restraining notices, executions, or garnishments. When conventional collection tools fall short, New York law provides one of the most powerful remedies available to judgment creditors: the appointment of a receiver under CPLR 5228.
A post-judgment receiver is a person appointed by the court and vested with authority to take control of a judgment debtor's property, administer it, sell it, or collect income from it — all for the purpose of satisfying the judgment. For creditors facing sophisticated or evasive debtors, receivership can transform a paper judgment into actual recovery. Our firm represents judgment creditors throughout the receivership process, from the initial motion through the receiver's final accounting and distribution of proceeds.
CPLR 5228 authorizes the court, upon motion of a judgment creditor, to appoint a receiver who may be authorized to administer, collect, improve, lease, repair, or sell any real or personal property in which the judgment debtor has an interest, or to do any other acts designed to satisfy the judgment. The receiver acts as an officer of the court — not as an agent of the creditor — and holds the debtor's property under judicial supervision.
This remedy is part of Article 52 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, which governs the enforcement of money judgments in New York. Unlike an execution delivered to a sheriff, which is best suited to straightforward levies on bank accounts or tangible goods, a receivership is a flexible, court-supervised mechanism designed for assets that require active management, careful liquidation, or ongoing collection efforts.
The appointment of a receiver is a discretionary remedy. New York courts do not grant it automatically upon request; instead, they weigh whether receivership is an appropriate and necessary tool under the circumstances. Courts typically consider three principal factors:
In practice, receivership is especially favored where the debtor's property is of a kind that resists ordinary enforcement. Common examples include:
Receivership is also a potent response to a debtor who refuses to cooperate with post-judgment discovery, ignores subpoenas, or engages in transactions that appear designed to place assets beyond the creditor's reach.
The order appointing the receiver defines the scope of the receiver's authority, and CPLR 5228 permits that authority to be broad. Depending on the terms of the order, a receiver may be empowered to:
Importantly, only one receiver may be appointed with respect to any particular property of a judgment debtor. If a receiver has already been appointed in another proceeding, a subsequent judgment creditor may move to extend that receivership to cover its own judgment rather than seeking a duplicative appointment.
Under CPLR 5228, a judgment creditor who secures the appointment of a receiver — or the extension of an existing receivership to its judgment — generally obtains priority over subsequent creditors with respect to the property covered by the receivership, subject to the statute's terms and existing liens. This priority feature makes an early, well-crafted receivership motion a significant strategic advantage when multiple creditors are pursuing the same debtor.
The court selects the receiver, and candidates are typically attorneys, accountants, or other professionals with experience managing or liquidating the type of property involved. In appropriate circumstances, and where the statute permits, a court may even appoint the judgment creditor or its designee to serve without compensation, which can reduce the cost of the remedy. The receiver ordinarily must file an oath and, where the court directs, post an undertaking (bond) before exercising any powers. The receiver owes fiduciary duties to the court and to all parties interested in the property — not merely to the creditor who sought the appointment.
A receiver is entitled to reasonable compensation as fixed by the court, generally payable from the receivership property or its proceeds. The receiver must keep accurate records and, at the conclusion of the receivership, render an accounting to the court showing all property received, expenses incurred, and distributions made. Court supervision at every stage protects the integrity of the process and ensures that proceeds are properly applied toward the judgment, with any surplus returned to the debtor.
Obtaining a post-judgment receiver in New York involves several distinct steps:
| Enforcement Device | Best Suited For | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Restraining notice (CPLR 5222) | Freezing bank accounts and property in third-party hands | Freezes but does not transfer assets; requires follow-up enforcement |
| Property execution (CPLR 5230) | Sheriff's levy on bank accounts and tangible personal property | Ineffective for complex, intangible, or income-producing assets |
| Income execution (CPLR 5231) | Wage garnishment of an employed debtor | Limited to a statutory percentage of earnings; slow recovery |
| Turnover proceeding (CPLR 5225/5227) | Compelling delivery of specific identified assets | Requires a discrete, identifiable asset and cooperative transfer mechanics |
| Receivership (CPLR 5228) | Business interests, real estate, income streams, and evasive debtors | Discretionary; involves court supervision and administrative cost |
These remedies are not mutually exclusive. A comprehensive enforcement strategy frequently combines restraining notices to freeze assets, discovery to locate them, and a receivership to reach the assets that other devices cannot effectively capture.
Our firm also counsels judgment debtors and third parties affected by receivership applications. Because receivership is an intrusive remedy, courts require a genuine showing of necessity. Grounds for opposing an appointment may include the availability of adequate alternative remedies, the absence of any risk of dissipation, disputes over the debtor's actual interest in the targeted property, exemptions protecting certain assets from enforcement, and defects in the underlying judgment or in the motion papers. Third parties — such as co-owners of property, business partners, or secured lenders — may also intervene to protect their interests when a proposed receivership threatens property in which they hold rights.
Receivership motions succeed or fail on preparation. A well-supported application demonstrates, with admissible evidence, that ordinary remedies have been exhausted or would be futile, that the targeted property is real and valuable, and that a receiver will materially improve the prospects of collection. The proposed order must be drafted with precision: powers that are too narrow leave the receiver unable to act, while overbroad or vague provisions invite challenge and delay. Counsel must also anticipate priority disputes among creditors, coordinate with any existing receiverships, and manage the receivership's costs so that the remedy remains economically sensible relative to the judgment amount.
Our attorneys handle every phase of judgment enforcement in New York, including asset investigation, post-judgment discovery, motions to appoint or extend receivers, sales of receivership property, contested accountings, and proceedings against third parties holding a debtor's assets. We serve as counsel to judgment creditors, act as court-appointed receivers when designated, and represent parties whose interests are affected by receivership orders.
Timing depends on the court's motion calendar and whether the application is contested. A well-prepared, unopposed motion may be decided in a matter of weeks; contested applications involving evidentiary disputes can take longer. Where dissipation is imminent, creditors can seek interim relief, such as restraining notices, to preserve the status quo while the motion is pending.
The receivership extends only to the property identified in the court's order. Where the debtor's principal asset is an ownership interest in a business, the receiver may be authorized to take control of that interest — including voting rights — and to sell it. The order defines the outer limits of the receiver's authority.
The receiver's commissions and authorized expenses are generally paid from the receivership property or its proceeds before distribution to the creditor. In some cases, the court may appoint the judgment creditor or its nominee to serve without compensation, minimizing cost.
Proceeds are applied to the receivership's expenses and the judgment, including post-judgment interest at New York's statutory rate. Any surplus belongs to the judgment debtor and is returned following the receiver's final accounting.
If you hold an unpaid judgment against a debtor with business interests, real estate, or income streams that ordinary enforcement tools cannot reach — or if you are facing a receivership application and need to protect your rights — prompt action is essential. Assets can be dissipated, priorities can be lost, and delay favors the uncooperative debtor. Contact our firm today to schedule a consultation and learn how New York's receivership remedy can be used to turn your judgment into recovery.
You can contact us by phone at 212-233-1233 or by email at [email protected].